Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235526 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak@xxxxx 2007-04-18 15:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 1. Is the name right here? According to the guidelines if the upstream has > 'py' in it you can just use that name: (...) > so perhaps pyxattr would be acceptable instead of python-xattr? You are right. I missed a line about an exception. > 2. Upstream doesn't seem to active, but you might ask if they can include > a copy of the GPL with the package. Not a blocker. Ok, I will. > 3. The Source URL should probibly be: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pyxattr/pyxattr-%{version}.tar.gz Changed. > 5. What is the > #Packager removed due to FE requirements > comment about? (This also applies to the pylibacl too) This spec file was originally made by Dag Wieers. I make a note that removed packager tag due to FE requirements not because I tried to descrease role of Dag in a package creation process. New links: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/pyxattr/pyxattr.spec http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/pyxattr/pyxattr-0.2.1-2.src.rpm Thanks for your reviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review