Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium overholt@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From overholt@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-18 15:12 EST ------- Sorry for taking so long to look at this. I've CC'd spot (and emailed him some of the back story) to get his take on the situation. (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #16) > > > > - plugins/org.python.pydev.jython_1.3.1/Lib. Where does the content of this > > directory come from? Is it necessary? If so, can we symlink it? Fabio says (copied from [1]): "All beneath org.python.pydev.jython/Lib come from jython 2.1. I just extracted it and bundled it in pydev (the jython guys probably have taken some of them from python). I don't think it's really safe to change those files, as it could break some things... that internal jython distribution is actually only used for jython scripting inside of pydev, but those scripts would have to be re-checked if an upgrade is done (I'd rather only do that update once jython 2.2 is stable)." So is it okay for us to include this separate copy? Jython's BSD and PyDev is EPL. What's python? If it's okay to include them from Fedora's standpoint (with the plan to symlink once jython 2.2 goes final) and from a legal POV, I'm okay with keeping them. > > - plugins/org.python.pydev_1.3.1/PySrc. What is the content of this directory? "The files from org.python.pydev/PySrc/ThirdParty are either from Bycicle repair man or ctypes (they are distributed in pydev, and executed under a separate shell)." We don't seem to have bicycle repairman or ctypes in Fedora. If the bits of those projects are necessary for non-testing purposes, can we include them for now and try to package those projects or do we need to package those projects first? > This is some auxiliary scripts that are used for running tests I believe. How much can we remove that's not testing-related? > > - plugins/org.python.pydev.jython_1.3.1/jysrc. Same questions as above. > > This is pydev's files, and they are jython scripts used to control pydev. Okay, great. > > - plugins/org.python.pydev.debug_1.3.1/pysrc. Same. > These seem to be pydev's own scripts. Okay, great. [1] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=cfb578b20704060345n677f8a26u5e87bbc3a4a20c8%40mail.gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review