Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium kevin@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2007-04-18 15:02 EST ------- >I get this warm fuzzy feeling when I get no errors or warnings, you >see. Also note that "all the subpackages" at the moment counts one :-) indeed. :) >Well, I don't know of anyone using varnish technology for anything but >varnish, so for an initial release, I'd say it's not necessary. A >devel package should perhaps include some header files and some >hacking starting point docs too. If we can push it for later, I'll ask >some of the developers for this. ok. Yeah, if you could talk to upstream about making a more fully featured devel package before shipping it, that would be great. I see no further blockers, so this package is APPROVED, and I would be happy to sponsor you. You can continue the process from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a601c13b0950a89568deafa65f505b4b58ee869b -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review