https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055378 --- Comment #31 from Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Comments... - Source1: icinga.tmpfiles.conf * This is fixed, thanks - Why is there gui and gui-config, if there is only 1 single gui-config package, couldn't they be merged to simplify packaging ? * Michael addressed this ans Icinga 2.x is released now. - %if 0%{?el7}%{?fc20}%{?fc21}%{?fc22} this is not very elegant, shouldn't it just be check against EL6 and disable systemd requires ( and if you go this way, please also take care of the requires on systemd-units ). * I've ripped this all out, this is for Fedora 20/21/EPEL7 - BuildRequires gcc is not needed * Removed - There is a few unowned directory ******* More eyes would help, if you see some let me know I will add %dir tags for them please ******** - License file is not installed in all case ( like if I install just the doc or just guide-config ) * Added - Could upstream be notified for the config.guess / config.sub issue ( so we can drop the explicit requires on libtool ) ? * Upstream has done this - %defattr(-,root,root,-) is not needed, please remove as the spec is already long enough :) * I've removed this specific entry but need the others however. SPEC: http://spstarr.fedorapeople.org/packages/icinga/icinga.spec SRPM: http://spstarr.fedorapeople.org/packages/icinga/icinga-1.11.5-1.fc21.src.rpm Please provide further feedback, the last thing I'd like is the SELinux pieces in place. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review