Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-17 23:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Well, this module (as most of the perl world) is indeed dual-licensed. While > the module itself is a touch misleading when it comes to this, one is the GPL, > the other is Artistic... Hence the license tag GPL or Artistic. I want to make sure we are talking about the same thing. I'm speaking specifically of these lines in the README: The instance routine is from Andy Wardley's <abw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Class::Singleton, and carries the following copyright and license. Copyright (C) 1998 Canon Research Centre Europe Ltd. All Rights Reserved. This module is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the term of the Perl Artistic License. If you set the license tag to "GPL or Artistic" it is misleading in that the entire package is not "GPL or Artistic", however, it can be entirely licensed as "Artistic". But if in your opinion you have the right info in the tag, I'm willing to go with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review