https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864 --- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #2) > Issues: > - A comment why %{?_smp_mflags} is disabled would be nice > - Comment how to obtain source tarball Fixed. After talking to upstream again, I found the right homepage URL and links to source tarballs there. > - Unowned directory issues: > * No package seems to own %{_libdir}/gfortran (possibly gfortran should do > so?) Fixed by adding the missing Requires on gcc-gfortran, as Dave pointed out. > * Same goes with %{_libdir}/*mpi*/pkgconfig > - rpmlint > * undefined-non-weak-symbol : these should be fixable my linking against > the mpi / gomp libraries I managed to fix that, but I'm still getting undefined symbols due to a bug in scalapack package. Bug 1113567 filed. > * unused-direct-shlib-dependency : could try -Wl,--as-needed It fails at linking when I add that. Also, these come from linking with mpif90 (which is as it turns out required to avoid the undefined mpi symbols). I'll keep trying to fix that. > Note: > - Spec in SRPM differs I'll keep the %if 0 there to allow disabling tests for quick local builds. New spec and srpm: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/elpa/elpa.spec http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/elpa/elpa-2013.11-2.008.fc20.src.rpm * Thu Jun 26 2014 Dominik Mierzejewski <rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2013.11-2.008 - remove executable stack from installed libraries - fix undefined non-weak mpi symbols - reorder build section and drop some redundant parts - add missing gfortran Requires for -devel subpackages - use correct URL and provide link to source tarball -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review