https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110913 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> --- * Package named correctly * Latest version packaged * License OK for fedora * License text included - License not field correct (see below) * SPEC file clean and legible * Builds fine in mock * Requires sane * Provides sane * Filelist sane * Proper compiler flags used 0.) Please use correct GitHub source file "For a number of reasons (immutability, availability, uniqueness), you must use the full commit revision hash when referring to the sources." http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github -Source0: https://github.com/jeroennijhof/pam_script/archive/%{version}.tar.gz +Source0: https://github.com/$OWNER/$PROJECT/archive/%{commit}/$PROJECT-%{commit}.tar.gz 1.) License is likely GPLv2+, not GPLv2 See the "or later version" clause in: https://github.com/jeroennijhof/pam_script/blob/master/pam_script.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review