[Bug 225765] Merge Review: fonts-japanese

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: fonts-japanese


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225765


panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx  2007-04-17 03:27 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
- rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM.
W: fonts-japanese rpm-buildroot-usage %build %configure --disable-bold
--disable-italic --with-fontdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{bmpfontdir}
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it
will break short circuiting.
===> the above is OK for this package as its only installing font files.
+ rpmlint is silent for RPM.
+ source files match upstream.
e8a452c07cd5d1d31d3a6f32c2b74265  jisksp14.bdf.gz
d0d24d605ee62833234b711d6766e16c  jisksp16-1990.bdf.gz
c59fc33f4319a291c1f3f7d58d896b9c  k14-oldkanji.tar.gz
e0a103ceeffe0aa1c5670458f47452b3  kaname_k12_bdf.tar.gz
065920714d022cfd225feb6d80b03238  knm_new.tar.gz
a97a99acbee54976407dec828d03850c  mplus_bitmap_fonts-2.2.4.tar.gz
e0e1d3b139159a2af09bc9867c9a654b  warabi12-0.19a.tar.gz
19ff56e6de82e8f9a02c9cebf5af0cdc  Kappa20-0.396.tar.bz2
b312f77829011547b19fc16956dc6f12  sazanami-20061016.tar.bz2
38ce9221d128383a3f9f50eb641da424  shinonome-0.9.11-src.tar.bz2
b3900ebac6dd1044423bef5e23d653dc  imamura-jisx0213.tgz
a412bc6920d29be2689b3c3192bcdbd2  marumoji.tgz
c6b7771e4f00e310fe807b3245fd316e  vine-fonttools-0.1.tgz
fa5981d270f432d36818329c8878ba6e  xfonts_jp.tgz
77d997789026b1829bb4a33f65a0ce78  jiskan16-1990.bdf.Z
c9fd21064b4ad6f1af0bcdb40a4222ee  jiskano16-1997.bdf.Z
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ Used Fonts Scriptlet.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Provides: fonts-ja = 8.0-16 jisksp14 = 0.1-16 jisksp16-1990 = 0.1-16 kappa20 =
0.3-15 knm_new = 1.1-16 ttfonts-ja = 1.2-37

APPROVED.




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]