https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111691 --- Comment #21 from David Nichols <david@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #20) > > libqore.x86_64: E: useless-provides qore-module(abi) > > rpmlint is mistaken in this case. A bug report had been filed years ago in > bug 460872, but it has been closed due to a misunderstanding. ok thanks for that info. > > Provides: qore-module(abi)%{?_isa} = 0.19 > > At some time, adding %{?_isa} to create arch-specific dependencies has > become popular and can also help the depsolver. For example, when the > depsolver encounters broken deps in a multiarch repo such as x86_64, it > would try to resolve the deps with i686 packages (even older ones), which > sometimes leads to pulling in lots of i686 packages. > > If you choose to add %{?_isa}, there is not much reason to also add the > non-%isa Provides. > > The audacious packages had started with non-%isa Provides, which should be > dropped nowadays since nothing depends on them anymore. ok I see that makes sense - I also had the same thought, but thought it was safer to do it just like an already-accepted package. new URLs: Spec URL: http://qore.org/srpms/qore.spec SRPM URL: http://qore.org/srpms/qore-0.8.11.1-2.fc20.src.rpm only the qore-module(abi) Provides were updated to remove the non-%isa versions. Michael, thanks a lot for your time, expertise, and help with this package submission review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review