[Bug 483663] Review Request: tetgen - A tetrahedral mesh generator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663



--- Comment #26 from Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Uhm, the -doc is not requiring the main package, and does ship a copy of the
license file.

As for the pkgdocdir, /usr/share/doc/tetgen-doc would need to exist anyways for
LICENSE, so I would end up having

%files
%doc README LICENSE
%dir %{_pkgdocdir}
%exclude %{_pkgdocdir}/manual.pdf
%exclude %{_pkgdocdir}/example.poly

%files doc
%doc LICENSE
%dir %{_pkgdocdir}
%{_pkgdocdir}/manual.pdf
%{_pkgdocdir}/example.poly


In my opinion, it is cleaner to just keep

%files
%doc README LICENSE

%files doc
%doc example.poly LICENSE manual.pdf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]