https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111692 --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Volker Fröhlich from comment #1) > You don't need a buildroot definition, a clean section and the initial rm in > the install section. Neither do you need defattr. Because of Fedora EPEL 5. > Why are you calling the package purple-whatsapp when the tarball is called > whatsapp-purple? Because all other packages in Fedora seem to be named purple-<ext> independent of the upstream tarball name. > The version constraint for libpurple is not necessary, as it is fulfilled in > any version of Fedora. That is right, but it doesn't hurt as well IMHO. > The author should provide a license file to include. Good point, inform upstream about that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review