https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096138 Robert Scheck <redhat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |redhat-bugzilla@linuxnetz.d | |e Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck <redhat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- There are some rpmlint errors that IMHO should not happen (rpath) and README file should not be executable: asdcplib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/asdcp-test ['/usr/lib64'] asdcplib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/kmuuidgen ['/usr/lib64'] asdcplib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/blackwave ['/usr/lib64'] asdcplib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/j2c-test ['/usr/lib64'] asdcplib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/asdcp-info ['/usr/lib64'] asdcplib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/asdcp-wrap ['/usr/lib64'] asdcplib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libasdcp-1.12.58.so /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 asdcplib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libasdcp-1.12.58.so /usr/lib64/libexpat.so.1 asdcplib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libasdcp-1.12.58.so ['/usr/lib64'] asdcplib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/klvsplit ['/usr/lib64'] asdcplib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libkumu-1.12.58.so /lib64/libssl.so.10 asdcplib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libkumu-1.12.58.so /lib64/libm.so.6 asdcplib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/kmfilegen ['/usr/lib64'] asdcplib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/kmrandgen ['/usr/lib64'] asdcplib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/asdcp-unwrap ['/usr/lib64'] asdcplib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/klvwalk ['/usr/lib64'] asdcplib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/asdcp-util ['/usr/lib64'] asdcplib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/wavesplit ['/usr/lib64'] asdcplib.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/asdcplib/README Additionally I am wondering about non-conform library soname/versioning: - /usr/lib64/libasdcp-1.12.58.so - /usr/lib64/libkumu-1.12.58.so Is this really correct and expected? Usually it is libfoo.so.1.2.3 or so. asdcplib-1.12.58/src/KM_tai.cpp and asdcplib-1.12.58/src/KM_tai.h are under public domain not BSD...shouldn't this be added to license tag? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review