[Bug 1110945] Review Request: voro++ - Library for 3D computations of the Voronoi tessellation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110945



--- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #8)
> Dunno, the library has reasons to live alone (i.e. for the gmsh dependency).
> Clearly, the argument could be made whether the space saved is worth the
> effort of shipping lib and binary in separate packages, but many other
> packages already do it like this.

Honestly, it seems to me a redundant split. Most of base packages are composed
by:

- binary file
- versioned library
- manpage file

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]