https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124 --- Comment #37 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- > Hm. I think that would work for cpp/qt developers too. Of course. "BuildRequires: qbs" would not be sufficient in that case. $ qbs No build graph exists yet for this configuration. Resolving project for configuration gcc-debug ERROR: /home/ms20b/tests/qbs/release.qbs:3:1 Product dependency 'cpp' not found. After installing qbs-cpp: $ qbs No build graph exists yet for this configuration. Resolving project for configuration gcc-debug ERROR: /usr/share/qbs/modules/cpp/GenericGCC.qbs:7:8 Can't find imported file /usr/share/qbs/modules/cpp/path-tools.js. Indeed. That file is not packaged, but available in the source tarball. A bug? Extracting that script from the tarball and installing it, I got this: $ qbs No build graph exists yet for this configuration. Resolving project for configuration gcc-debug ERROR: /usr/share/qbs/imports/qbs/base/CppApplication.qbs:4:5 Module cpp could not be loaded. -> More runtime testing of these "qbs" packages is needed. [...] Another packaging issue: $ rpm -qf /usr/share/doc/qbs/* qbs-1.2.1-2.fc20.x86_64 qbs-doc-1.2.1-2.fc20.noarch qbs-1.2.1-2.fc20.x86_64 qbs-doc-1.2.1-2.fc20.noarch qbs-1.2.1-2.fc20.x86_64 qbs-doc-1.2.1-2.fc20.noarch qbs-1.2.1-2.fc20.x86_64 qbs-doc-1.2.1-2.fc20.noarch The reason is that as of Fedora 20 you cannot use %doc and %_docdir/%name, since the former includes everything below %_docdir/%name (aka the unversioned docdirs feature of F20): https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/338 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review