https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390 --- Comment #3 from Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimilan@xxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1) > Per your strategy, will there come llvm3.4, llvm3.5 in the future? Because > LLVM API is never stable. Well, it really depends on how Fedora's and Julia's schedules interact in the future. With some luck, when a new Fedora release goes out, Julia will happen to use the latest LLVM version, and we won't need a versioned llvm package. But OTOH when backporting a new LLVM version to a published Fedora release, it's likely that Julia will break as there will likely be some lag between LLVM's and Julia's releases. With an unstable API like LLVM's, versioned parallel-installable packages are kind of inevitable. (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #2) > Does Julia upstream have any plans to move to llvm-3.4 btw? Yes, the next version will use LLVM 3.5. (Support for 3.4 is almost present already, but there are a few bugs and it has not been tested thoroughly enough that the developers feel confident to use it now.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review