[Bug 1096809] Review Request: mingw-SDL2_mixer - MinGW Windows port of Simple DirectMedia Layer's Sample Mixer Library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096809

David King <amigadave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |amigadave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |amigadave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #3 from David King <amigadave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Generally, it looks pretty good, just the homepage location needs fixing.

* the homepage (URL and Source0) has a typo, it should be:
http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_mixer/

Would you be able to do a review swap with bug 1076456?

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


Issues:
=======
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
  Note: mingw32-SDL2_mixer : /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
  root/mingw/include/SDL2/SDL_mixer.h mingw64-SDL2_mixer :
  /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/SDL2/SDL_mixer.h
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages

Not a problem for mingw packages.

- Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if
  present.
  Note: Package has .a files: mingw32-SDL2_mixer, mingw64-SDL2_mixer. Illegal
  package name: mingw32-SDL2_mixer, mingw64-SDL2_mixer. Does not provide
  -static: mingw32-SDL2_mixer, mingw64-SDL2_mixer.
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries

Also not a problem for mingw packages.

===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "LGPL
     (v2.1 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v2 or later)",
     "Unknown or generated", "LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF
     address)", "ISC", "zlib/libpng", "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF
     address)", "BSD (3 clause)", "LGPL (with incorrect FSF address)", "LGPL
     (v2.1 or later)", "*No copyright* Public domain". 313 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/david/checkout/rpms/1096809-mingw-SDL2_mixer/licensecheck.txt

All the licenses other than zlib are in third-party libraries, which are not
built, so the license tag is fine.

[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/include/SDL2(mingw64-SDL2), /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/include/SDL2(mingw32-SDL2)

As the binary packages generated from this package require SDL2, not owning
those directories is fine.

[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 6 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[!]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
     Note: Could not download Source0:
     http://www.libSDL2.org/projects/SDL_mixer/release/SDL2_mixer-2.0.0.tar.gz
     See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags

Incorrect homepage location, already mentioned above.

[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     mingw32-SDL2_mixer , mingw64-SDL2_mixer
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
     Note: mingw32-SDL2_mixer : /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/SDL2_mixer.pc mingw64-SDL2_mixer :
     /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/SDL2_mixer.pc
[-]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
     Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: mingw32-SDL2_mixer-2.0.0-2.fc21.noarch.rpm
          mingw64-SDL2_mixer-2.0.0-2.fc21.noarch.rpm
          mingw-SDL2_mixer-2.0.0-2.fc21.src.rpm
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi ->
mulch, mufti
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: invalid-url URL:
http://www.libSDL2.org/projects/SDL_mixer/ <urlopen error [Errno 111]
Connection refused>
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL2_mixer.dll.a
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/mingw32-SDL2_mixer/COPYING.txt
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/mingw32-SDL2_mixer/README.txt
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/SDL2/SDL_mixer.h
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL2_mixer.dll.a
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL2_mixer.dll.a
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/SDL2_mixer.pc
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/mingw32-SDL2_mixer/CHANGES.txt
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-w64-mingw32
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi ->
mulch, mufti
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: invalid-url URL:
http://www.libSDL2.org/projects/SDL_mixer/ <urlopen error [Errno 111]
Connection refused>
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL2_mixer.dll.a
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/SDL2/SDL_mixer.h
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/mingw64-SDL2_mixer/CHANGES.txt
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL2_mixer.dll.a
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL2_mixer.dll.a
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/SDL2_mixer.pc
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/mingw64-SDL2_mixer/COPYING.txt
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/mingw64-SDL2_mixer/README.txt
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr x86_64-w64-mingw32
mingw-SDL2_mixer.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch,
mufti
mingw-SDL2_mixer.src: W: invalid-url URL:
http://www.libSDL2.org/projects/SDL_mixer/ <urlopen error [Errno 111]
Connection refused>
mingw-SDL2_mixer.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://www.libSDL2.org/projects/SDL_mixer/release/SDL2_mixer-2.0.0.tar.gz
<urlopen error [Errno 111] Connection refused>
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 23 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint mingw32-SDL2_mixer mingw64-SDL2_mixer
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi ->
mulch, mufti
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: invalid-url URL:
http://www.libSDL2.org/projects/SDL_mixer/ <urlopen error [Errno 111]
Connection refused>
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/mingw32-SDL2_mixer/COPYING.txt
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/mingw32-SDL2_mixer/README.txt
mingw32-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/mingw32-SDL2_mixer/CHANGES.txt
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi ->
mulch, mufti
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: invalid-url URL:
http://www.libSDL2.org/projects/SDL_mixer/ <urlopen error [Errno 111]
Connection refused>
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/mingw64-SDL2_mixer/CHANGES.txt
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/mingw64-SDL2_mixer/COPYING.txt
mingw64-SDL2_mixer.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/mingw64-SDL2_mixer/README.txt
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
mingw32-SDL2_mixer (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    mingw32(kernel32.dll)
    mingw32(libflac-8.dll)
    mingw32(libvorbisfile-3.dll)
    mingw32(msvcrt.dll)
    mingw32(sdl2.dll)
    mingw32(winmm.dll)
    mingw32-crt
    mingw32-filesystem
    mingw32-pkg-config

mingw64-SDL2_mixer (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    mingw64(kernel32.dll)
    mingw64(libflac-8.dll)
    mingw64(libvorbisfile-3.dll)
    mingw64(msvcrt.dll)
    mingw64(sdl2.dll)
    mingw64(winmm.dll)
    mingw64-crt
    mingw64-filesystem
    mingw64-pkg-config



Provides
--------
mingw32-SDL2_mixer:
    mingw32(sdl2_mixer.dll)
    mingw32-SDL2_mixer

mingw64-SDL2_mixer:
    mingw64(sdl2_mixer.dll)
    mingw64-SDL2_mixer



Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1096809
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl,
Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]