https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #44 from Baurzhan Muftakhidinov <baurthefirst@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #43) > (In reply to Baurzhan Muftakhidinov from comment #42) > > Hi, > > I put rhel version there to ensure that build passes. Otherwise, without > > second check, %if 0%{?fedora} < 20 was true for rhel7 and build searched for > > llvm-3.3 and not for llvm33. > > Correct check should be like > > %if 0%{?fedora} < 20 AND NOT 0%{?rhel} but I don't know how to write it > > correctly. > Yeah, I found it a little weird at first, but actually I think it's OK and > the build works for all versions. I think we could get the same result by > depending on llvm == 3.3 || llvm3.3. > > Now it would be good to understand why it doesn't work for EPEL6. julia depends on fftw > 3.4 which requires gcc > 4.6 to get built. Also pcre is too old in el6, same goes for suitesparse. For epel6 the only way I can think of is to distribute archive with pre-built Julia, like for Windows. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review