https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108395 --- Comment #5 from Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> --- > ---> About this - Is there a specific reason why .desktop and icons are in -common instead of the base package? Yes, you should theoretically be able to install just netgen-mesher-openmpi or netgen-mesher-mpich and then, when loading the respective MPI environment, i.e. /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin will be added to the PATH, and the desktop file should *theoretically* launch that executable. So putting the desktop file in common makes is valid for all variants of the netgen-mesher executable. Probably somewhat of an overkill, but yeah :) > ---> Could this (and few more shared-libs-calls-exit) be fixed or brought to attention of the upstream folks? Yes, could also try to get some of the patches upstreamed > ---> From the build log and buildroot, the patches are applied during build. %autosetup does this Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/netgen-mesher.spec SRPM URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/netgen-mesher-5.1-5.fc21.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Jun 14 2014 Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> - 5.1-5 - Add subpackage for private headers - Add patches from salome - Make common package noarch - Add missing %%{?_isa} Remarks about private headers and salome patch: - Private headers are needed to compile the salome-smesh netgen plugin (which is in turn required for salome-meca -> code aster). Instead of going the way of a bundling exception and what not, I guess this is the simplest approach. - Salome patches: reviewing the patch, they just fixed various issues with the code, not otherwise changing the behaviour of the code. So again, just patching the sources directly is easier than bundling a separate netgen in salome. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review