https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #40 from Baurzhan Muftakhidinov <baurthefirst@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #38) > Could anybody on 32-bit check whether Julia starts correctly with the > following package on F20? What's changed is that it should now run on all > i386 CPUs, not only on recent ones (but checking that it works somewhere is > a good start ;-). Thanks! > > http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/nalimilan/julia/fedora-20- > i386/julia-0.3.0-2.fc20/ 1) In your spec file of julia, line 41, you have %if 0%{fedora} < 20 which gives error when building on epel7, I changed it to %if 0%{?fedora} < 20 2) Due to LLVM being shipped as llvm3.3 package, I changed that line again, to %if 0%{?fedora} < 20 && 0%{?rhel} < 6 3) Line 33 BuildRequires: double-conversion-devel >= 1.1.1 gave build error, changed to BuildRequires: double-conversion-devel >= 2.0.0 4) Required packages built for epel7. What is the policy of adding new packages to epel? Having openlibm, utf8proc, openspecfun, openblas, patchelf there will be very useful. Finally, julia built successfully, you may want to see the results at https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/baurzhanm/julia-epel7/builds/ IMHO, because of RHEL7 (Centos 7) having a long-term support, it serves as a good candidate to have julia too (educational purposes, etc). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review