[Bug 1101235] Review Request: qauth - Qt user authentication library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101235



--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
naming: ok

I question the value of a -helpers subpkg, only value is saving ~100k in the
multilib case (e.g. avoids an extra 100k of i686 binary on x86_64 systems, but
they payload doesn't land on disk due to arch coloring anyway)

As mentioned in comment #2

1.  subpkgs MUST
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}

2.  %{_libdir}/libqauth.so MUST be owned by -devel subpkg, I'd suggest (main)
%{_libdir}/libqauth.so.0*

and -devel
%{_libdir}/libqauth.so

3.  -devel subpkg MUST own %{_includedir}/QAuth , I'd suggest switching
%{_includedir}/QAuth/*
to
%{_includedir}/QAuth/

4.  %%description currently mentions Qt5, but no qt5 support is currently
included.  I'd suggest leaving versions out, use something like
%description
QAuth is a Qt user authentication library... 
instead (to be version agnostic).

5.  licensing mostly ok, but SHOULD make it clearer if possible.  Afaict, the
library itself is LGPLv2+, and the helper portion is GPLv2+, is that correct? 
If so, please clarify that in a .spec comment near the License: tag

6.  SHOULD document need for
Requires: xorg-x11-xinit

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]