[Bug 908088] Review Request: ascend - ASCEND modelling environment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908088



--- Comment #18 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #17)
> -data still has:
> Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> should be:
> Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
> 
> -devel has:
> Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release}
> should be:
> Requires: %{name}-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> 
> 
> I'm curious now, if there's a circular dependency between the main pkg
> (Requires: %{name}-data) and -data (Requires: %{name}), why even make a
> -data subpkg?

Initially, I prefered to split all files both to put them in order and to
organise them in the better manner; even if they may be packaged in a single
rpm.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]