Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx 2007-04-15 02:39 EST ------- Okay here's the run down of the rest of the technical review blockers. - pigment-devel needs to require gtk-doc for directory ownership of /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/ - need to exclude /usr/lib/pigment-0.1/gstreamer/libpgmrendersink.la - need to exclude /usr/lib/pigment-0.1/libpgmrendergl1.la - fix the SOURCE and URL tags to use elisa.fluendo.com instead of www.fluendo.com Additional non-blocking suggestion: remove glib2-devel BuildRequires as its pulled in by gtk2-devel rpmlint returns clean on my locally rpmbuild --rebuild built development binaries One question: does pigment count as a python addon, and if so does the python naming scheme require python-pigment for the package name? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review