https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097426 --- Comment #6 from Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Flavio, the ExcludeArch directive is because of this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Architecture_Support though, they do use an ExclusiveArch example right below it, and dpdk is never going to run on anything non-x86, so I may as well change it. As for the Dual licensing, All the items in DPDK that are GPL or LGPL licensed are actually out of tree kernel modules, that I've configured to not build (for obvious reasons). As such everything that makes it into the manifest is BSD licensed, but I can add a comment to that effect. Will update the buildrequires, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review