https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908088 --- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- License: OK Item 3 above not completely fixed, there's still one reference to %{python_sitearch} 8. -libs subpkg MUST include ldconfig scriptlets (and now main pkg no longer needs them) 9. nothing depends on new -libs subpkg. You probably want to add a dependency to at least the main and -devel subpkgs: Requires: %{name}-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} (and have -devel drop dep on main pkg). While we're at it, make -libs, -data dep on main pkg *not* use %_isa (else you lose the whole point of making a -libs subpkg to be multilib -friendly) 10. nothing depends on -data subpkg, should main pkg depend on it? Or is it optional addon? 11. While on the topic of -libs, I'd recommend it *only* include the shared library here, plus any essential resources the library may require. Is there a reason you added all that other stuff too? 12. MUST omit extraneous python dep Requires: python >= 2.4 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Multiple_Python_Runtimes (it'll get an automatic dependency on python(abi) instead) 13. MUST omit gcc-c++ dependency, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 14. URL: http://ascend.cheme.cmu.edu/ seems inaccessible (at the moment?). Googling found me http://ascend4.org/ too, but it's not working either. Please verify which URL is correct. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review