[Bug 1101043] Review Request: ming - A library for generating Macromedia Flash files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101043

Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Taking.

Several minor issues:

- Package contains a testsuite, but the spec doesn't excercise it.
Feel strongly encouraged to add a %check section:

%check
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(pwd)/src/.libs make check

- %defattr(-,root,root,-) is only needed to support ancient RHELs.
Please remove these, unless you plan to support them.

- I recommend to append --disable-silent-rules to %configure instead of using
make V=1. This moves "switching on verbosity" from build-time to configure-time
(It hard-codes verbosity into Makefiles).

- src/ming.h (rsp. src/ming.h.in) contains "dirty code" (Read: a bug)

It wraps stdio.h into extern "C" { ... } guards:
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif
...
#include <stdio.h>
...

(#include <stdio.h> should be moved above the 'extern "C"')

ATM, this bug seems hidden and harmless, but in general, such misplaced extern
"C"s may interfere stdio.h's interaction with C++.


Finally, there is a major [MUSTFIX] bug:

- The *devel-package isn't multilib-capable, due to hard coded paths in
/usr/bin/ming-config. One common approach to work around such issues is to
modify such *-config scripts in such a way that they work as wrappers to
pkg-config.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]