https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060440 Rahul Amaram <amaramrahul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(amaramrahul@users | |.sourceforge.net) | --- Comment #15 from Rahul Amaram <amaramrahul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Matěj Cepl from comment #12) > (In reply to Rahul Amaram from comment #9) > > I have addressed both these issues in version 5.2 which I have just pushed > > into debian unstable. It would be great if you could sync calendarserver 5.2 > > and pycalendar 2.0~svn13177-1 from debian unstable. > > It’s awesome to have you here: could I ask one deep question which I am > still worried about? Why do you need separate python-plist package at all? > Wouldn’t https://docs.python.org/2/library/plistlib.html be sufficient? I > don’t want to introduce to Fedora packages which are not strictly necessary. I am not sure if I understand your question completely. Debian packages has no dependency on python-plist. On a very old calendarserver debian package, it did have dependency on python-plist, but this is no longer the case. If you are enquiring about twext.python.plistlib in the calendarserver source package, then you will have to ask this the upstream author or discuss in calednarserver-dev mailing list as plistlib is bundled with upstream package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review