[Bug 459125] Review Request: freecad - A general purpose 3D CAD modeler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125



--- Comment #24 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Ok, per http://www.freecadweb.org/wiki/index.php?title=Licence

Freecad up to 0.13 (the current release) it is technically LGPLv2+ (even though
it's an application, this is on purpose), but because it links with Coin2 and
PyQt, the end result is GPLv2+ as you suggested. Both of those requirements
will be replaced in the next release so the license will change back to
LGPLv2+.

As far as the documentation goes I was going nuts trying to figure out why
freecad.qhc was ending up the the main package even though I made do reference
to the docdir and then I remembered that when we changed to unversioned doc dir
I think the macro changed to glob anything in the docdir automatically, at
least that's my theory. I'm going to try adding an exclude to stop this.

One of the side effects of this is now the freecad package will have to require
the doc package unless FreeCAD gracefully handles the problem of the
documentation not being there.

The Start_page.html file is left over from verions 0.9 and is way outdated so I
think I may just rm -rf it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]