Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-13 07:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > > (In reply to comment #29) > > [tasaka1@localhost i386]$ rpmlint LabPlot > > W: LabPlot incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.5.1.5-4 1.5.1.5-4.2.fc7 > > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > > /usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0 > > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > > /usr/lib/liblcms.so.1 > > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > > /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 > > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > > /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 > > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > > /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 > > It can be ignored. Yes. Anyway, please check my spec file and fix it. Especially, * it seems for me that -devel package is not useful because -devel package does not contain any header files * I don't understand why you don't split -fr documents -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review