https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 --- Comment #4 from Martín Buenahora <martinbuenahora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Eduardo Echeverria from comment #3) > Hi Martin. > > As said @Jason, some tags are specifically EPEL5's dependents, please don't > use it. refer to epel packaging guidelines for further details (It is > important to note that epel6 guidelines are the same of fedora) > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging. > > This is a snapshot or stable release? if is a snapshot, check this > guidelines > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/ > NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages > > If you not have anything to build in %build section, put it a comment as > "Nothing to build" there > > I think that screenfetch-dev it is not a good name for an "binary", I > recommend rename it. > > From my POW, bash not should be a explicit requirement, due to is the > default in fedora and other linux distributions. > > For now, I will take this, I'm waiting your fixes soon. :) Ok, thank you. I think the "screenfetch-dev" file must be linked to "screenfetch". I think that's better than renaming the file itself, because it makes easier to maintain. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review