https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088696 José Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from José Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> --- I placed the review text above and I have the short here because, at least to me, it is easier to read. The problems with installation above are due to me using F-20 as the build root and octave-netcdf is not available there. On the other hand octave-statistics it is still in review and there was no explicit dependency between both reviews. I will take it and fix this issue. :-) Regarding the second issue, COPYING is packaged but not marked as %doc and the guidelines imply, as far as I read it, that it _must_ be done. Since you are the responsible for most of the octave guidelines I trust on this issue to fix it or to take any other action about it. This package is APPROVED. (sorry I did not meant to shout. :-) ) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review