https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096796 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- $ rpmlint mingw-SDL2.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw-SDL2-2.0.3-2.fc21.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-SDL2-2.0.3-2.fc21.noarch.rpm mingw64-SDL2-2.0.3-2.fc21.noarch.rpm mingw32-SDL2.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mingw32-SDL2/COPYING.txt mingw32-SDL2.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mingw32-SDL2/README.txt mingw64-SDL2.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mingw64-SDL2/README.txt mingw64-SDL2.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mingw64-SDL2/COPYING.txt 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. $ rpm --query --requires mingw32-SDL2 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 mingw32-crt mingw32-filesystem >= 95 mingw32(gdi32.dll) mingw32(iconv.dll) mingw32(imm32.dll) mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32(ole32.dll) mingw32(oleaut32.dll) mingw32-pkg-config mingw32(shell32.dll) mingw32(user32.dll) mingw32(version.dll) mingw32(winmm.dll) rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 $ rpm --query --requires mingw64-SDL2 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 mingw64-crt mingw64-filesystem >= 95 mingw64(gdi32.dll) mingw64(iconv.dll) mingw64(imm32.dll) mingw64(kernel32.dll) mingw64(msvcrt.dll) mingw64(ole32.dll) mingw64(oleaut32.dll) mingw64-pkg-config mingw64(shell32.dll) mingw64(user32.dll) mingw64(version.dll) mingw64(winmm.dll) rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 $ rpm --query --provides mingw32-SDL2 mingw32-SDL2 = 2.0.3-2.fc21 mingw32(sdl2.dll) $ rpm --query --provides mingw64-SDL2 mingw64-SDL2 = 2.0.3-2.fc21 mingw64(sdl2.dll) $ wget --quiet http://www.libsdl.org/release/SDL2-2.0.3.tar.gz -O - | md5sum fe6c61d2e9df9ef570e7e80c6e822537 - $ md5sum SDL2-2.0.3.tar.gz fe6c61d2e9df9ef570e7e80c6e822537 SDL2-2.0.3.tar.gz + OK ! Needs to be looked into / Not applicable [!] Compliant with generic Fedora Packaging Guidelines [+] Source package name is prefixed with 'mingw-' [+] Spec file starts with %{?mingw_package_header} [+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file [+] BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file [+] Spec file contains %package sections for both mingw32 and mingw64 packages [+] Binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are noarch [+] Spec file contains %{?mingw_debug_package} after the %description section [+] Uses one of the macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, or %mingw_cmake_kde4 to configure the package [+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to build the package [+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to install the package [/] If package contains translations, the %mingw_find_lang macro must be used [+] No binary package named mingw-$pkgname is generated [+] Libtool .la files are not bundled [+] .def files are not bundled [+] Man pages which duplicate native package are not bundled [+] Info files which duplicate native package are not bundled [+] Provides of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal [+] Requires of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal The rpmlint warnings still need to be resolved. This can be done by adding a 'BuildRequires: dos2unix' and adding the command 'dos2unix COPYING.txt README.txt' after the %setup line Please fix this before importing the package in Fedora =================================================== The package mingw-libSDL2 is APPROVED by epienbro =================================================== -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review