Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-12 11:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > > E: sendmail hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/libmilter.a > > => false positive, the %install script is removing the library incorrectly > > => installed there by the upstream build script > This is wrong, because /usr/lib/libmilter.a gets removed for a 64 bit build, > because /usr/lib/libmilter.a has to be 32 bit here, but sendmail installs the 64 > bit build. OK, but that's what I meant; the upstream installer puts it in /usr/lib and the spec puts it in /usr/lib64, so the upstream-installed one needs to be removed on x86_64. > symlinks is not usable, because it would create realtive links outside of the > buildroot. Are you sure? I tried the patch from Comment #8 before posting it and it looked to be doing the right thing to me. > %{_localstatedir} ist not /var it is %{_prefix}/var, ergo /usr/var. $ rpm --eval '%{_localstatedir}' /var > /etc/aliases is not part of the sendmail package. It should be if the package is supposed to work with %{old_setup} = yes (obviously not for current Fedora versions but for people trying to rebuild for older distros). I don't think %{old_setup} should be supported half-heartedly - either let it work properly or remove it altogether. > ===> Please have a look at sendmail-8.14.1-1. Where can I find that? It's not in my just-updated cvs checkout. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review