[Bug 982204] Review Request: Elm - The Elm language module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204



--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #11)
> I wonder if it is better to use the tarball releases from github for now
> which includes the standard library.

Seems this is not necessary actually.
The Elm package already includes the compiled libraries, see:

> https://github.com/elm-lang/Elm/issues/580

Though I dunno if it would still not be better to do so strictly
- more Fedora-esque perhaps?  (building from source afap)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]