https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091770 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- > I just wanted to put the subpackage there so I don't need to > re-review later. Similar for examples. Adding sub-packages doesn't need a re-review. You could push a simpler package through review and add sub-packages once it's in Fedora dist git. > I'm not sure what you mean here. What are you looking for this to say? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package > I wrote in every single header GPLv2 (or at your discretion, a later version). > So GPLv3+ seems perfectly reasonable. If you'd like I can make it GPLv2+ If the source file headers say GPLv2+ and the COPYING file says GPLv3, that's ambiguous - and GPLv3+ licensing doesn't permit the same things (such as copying from GPLv2+ sources into a GPLv2 project). https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review