https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094415 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #3) > I'm not sure I'm happy with it, but it is the most immutable way. > > As for jj2000, the usual thing we try to do is to get upstream to accept the > changes if possible so we can use the system version. form google jj200 site: "The code here originally came from version 5.1 of JJ2000 as downloaded from this website: http://jpeg2000.epfl.ch/. However, that code is incomplete, has bugs, has performance issues, and has memory-usage issues. So a Google Code project was created so that modifications and improvements could be made." More project (e.g. http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/tds/ aka thredds aka netcdf-java submodule grib ) use a proper mod of the same library. your suggestion s not applicable for various reasons, in addition to those listed in the upstream site -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review