https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094581 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> --- Review: + Package builds successful in F21 x86_64 mock + rpmlint on generated rpms gave 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum) srpm tarball: 3ca04f52c3d0d53dd37a6b9f9412659ddf3b8453e930c3c82fca25c853da7cc5 upstream tarball : 3ca04f52c3d0d53dd37a6b9f9412659ddf3b8453e930c3c82fca25c853da7cc5 + License is valid GPLv2+ and included in its own text file LICENSE.txt + Package follows drupal7 packaging guidelines Suggestions: 1) Group tag is not necessary in Fedora now and can be removed from spec file. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Group_tag APPROVED this package review. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review