https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070702 --- Comment #7 from Jan Staněk <jstanek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #5) > From my point of view the package should be named "lmdb" as it is upstream > name. Only libraries should be liblmdb. The "l" is for "lightning", right? The point of the package name "liblmdb" is that the whole project is a library - the test programs really does not count. I feel that this area is a bit hazy, but in this case I used our naming schema of libdb/BerkeleyDB - the project name is AFAIK "Oracle BerkeleyDB" and the package is libdb (since the whole project is embedded DB/library). However as I stated, the naming scheme is not clear, and since I am not aware of any official guideline, it could be renamed back to "lmdb". Personally, I would stick with liblmdb, but if Howard have any feeling about the naming, I will adapt to them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review