[Bug 236041] Review Request: libx86 - libx86 library from X

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libx86 - libx86 library from X


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236041


jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?,
                   |                            |needinfo?(pjones@xxxxxxxxxx)




------- Additional Comments From jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-04-11 13:51 EST -------
Cosmetic, but any reason for BuildPreReq instead of just BuildReq?

Also lame, but since our RPM can't do it itself yet, buildroot value MUST be
below %{_tmppath}/ and MUST contain at least %{name}, %{version} and %{release}.
 See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473

Source tag should be a URL to the upstream tarball if possible:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL  (somewhat cosmetic, but
helpful too)

Another cosmetic thing, summary isn't capitalized, but since the first word is
the name of the software, and that name is 'libx86' this is ignorable.

Package currently doesn't build for rawhide x86_64.

The build on i386 had a couple interesting rpmlint issues:

E: libx86 shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libx86.so.1
shlib-with-non-pic-code :
The listed shared libraries contain object code that was compiled
without -fPIC. All object code in shared libraries should be
recompiled separately from the static libraries with the -fPIC option.

Another common mistake that causes this problem is linking with
``gcc -Wl,-shared'' instead of ``gcc -shared''.


W: libx86-devel spurious-executable-perm /usr/include/libx86.h
No reason why that should be executable, but it's just a warning.

x86_64 build issue:
make LIBRARY=static static
make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libx86-0.99'
cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic   -c -o x86-common.o x86-common.c
x86-common.c: In function 'get_int_seg':
x86-common.c:193: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
x86-common.c: In function 'get_int_off':
x86-common.c:200: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic   -c -o lrmi.o lrmi.c
lrmi.c:83: error: field 'vm' has incomplete type

Cascade from there.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]