[Bug 1081782] Review Request: astloch-fonts - Astloch fonts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081782



--- Comment #8 from Julien Enselme <jujens@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Paul Flo Williams from comment #6)
> Just a few points:
> 
> 1. The FontForge sources for these fonts are available from the Google font
> directory so, according to our packaging policy, these fonts SHOULD be built
> from source.
> 
OK, I am building them from source now. Thanks for pointing that out.
> 2. The word "fracture" in the description should be "Fraktur".
> 
Corrected.
> 3. Our fonts policy now says that fonts must include correct licensing
> fields in the metadata. In this case, you'll need to correct the metadata
> after building, using the ttname tool.
> 
Corrected. However, ttname always exits with status 1 even if the ttf files are
correctly patched. I have the same issue if I just use ttname to display
informations on the fonts. Hence the ugly `|| exit 0` at the end of the ttname
line. Any idea on that?
> 4. The fontconfig file isn't correct. You need to register both fonts with
> the generic name "cursive" using the basic-font-template.conf supplied with
> fontpackages-devel.
Corrected. Thank for your answer.

SPECS:
http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SPECS/astloch-fonts.spec
SRPMS:
http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SRPMS/astloch-fonts-1.00-2.41528389c445hg.fc20.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]