Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mdadm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226134 dledford@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dledford@xxxxxxxxx| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From dledford@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-11 11:30 EST ------- BuildRoot fixed Missing SMP flags fixed /sbin != %{_sbindir}, and this package *really* needs to be in /sbin, not /usr/sbin Cleaning of buildroot done The make during build was due to building things out of order and the Makefile was rebuilding mdadm because the object files were newer than the mdadm binary. Make mdadm the last thing to be built during %build solves the issue. Timestamps for man pages and mdmonitor fixed, for all the others they are done as part of the %doc macro, so if that gets them wrong then there's not much to do (although viewing the output shows %doc is using -p, so I suspect their timestamps are actually correct). Dependencies done. mdadm is a reasonable exception to the default off policy. It exits immediately if there is nothing for it to monitor, and if there is something for it to monitor, it's responsible for notifying the admin of failure events in their hardware that might compromise their raid subsystem integrity. Announce files dropped. Changelog fixed As for sendmail, don't all the various MTA alternatives that provide smtpdaemon also provide a sendmail compatibility link via alternatives? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review