https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093186 --- Comment #4 from Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines - Package does not own all of its directories: Note: No known owner of /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/files, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/manifests, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/templates, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/builder, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/vagrant, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/lib - Package does not require all packages it needs: the puppet-gluster-vagrant needs Vagrant (which unpackages) to be of any use - Package contains bundled "libraries": even worse, it contains bundled RPMS in the builder/ directory! - Large documentation is in main package: the puppet-gluster-documentation.pdf should DEFENITELY go into a -doc subpackage, maybe some other doc files as well - Installation fails: the -vagrant subpackage requires the root package WITH %{?_isa}, which is not going to work with noarch packages - Package does NOT preserve timestamps with the copy actions - Upstream includes a way to recreate the PDF from the DOCUMENTATION.md sources, please use that to create the pdf so we don't ship binary stuff from the sources - Spec file mixes tabs and spaces. Please use either spaces or tabs, but not both: Examples: Line 3 uses tab, line 17 uses spaces ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/files, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/manifests, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/templates, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/builder, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/vagrant, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/lib [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/files, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/templates, /usr/share/puppet/modules, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/manifests, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/lib, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/vagrant, /usr/share/puppet/modules/gluster/builder, /usr/share/puppet [!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [!]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 327680 bytes in 14 files. [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [-]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Installation errors ------------------- INFO: mock.py version 1.1.38 starting... Start: init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish: init plugins Start: run Mock Version: 1.1.38 INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.38 Start: lock buildroot INFO: installing package(s): /home/puiterwijk/Documents/Development/Fedora/Review/1093186-puppet-gluster/results/puppet-gluster-0.0.2-1.fc20.noarch.rpm /home/puiterwijk/Documents/Development/Fedora/Review/1093186-puppet-gluster/results/puppet-gluster-vagrant-0.0.2-1.fc20.noarch.rpm ERROR: Command failed: # ['/usr/bin/yum', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-20-x86_64/root/', '--releasever', '20', 'install', '/home/puiterwijk/Documents/Development/Fedora/Review/1093186-puppet-gluster/results/puppet-gluster-0.0.2-1.fc20.noarch.rpm', '/home/puiterwijk/Documents/Development/Fedora/Review/1093186-puppet-gluster/results/puppet-gluster-vagrant-0.0.2-1.fc20.noarch.rpm', '--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts'] Error: Package: puppet-gluster-vagrant-0.0.2-1.fc20.noarch (/puppet-gluster-vagrant-0.0.2-1.fc20.noarch) Requires: puppet-gluster(x86-64) = 0.0.2-1.fc20 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest Rpmlint ------- Checking: puppet-gluster-0.0.2-1.fc20.noarch.rpm puppet-gluster-vagrant-0.0.2-1.fc20.noarch.rpm puppet-gluster-0.0.2-1.fc20.src.rpm puppet-gluster-vagrant.noarch: W: no-documentation puppet-gluster.src:25: W: setup-not-quiet puppet-gluster.src:17: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 17, tab: line 3) 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Requires -------- puppet-gluster (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python puppet puppet-gluster-vagrant (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/bash puppet-gluster(x86-64) Provides -------- puppet-gluster: puppet-gluster puppet-gluster-vagrant: puppet-gluster-vagrant Source checksums ---------------- https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/purpleidea/puppet-gluster/SOURCES/puppet-gluster-0.0.2.tar.bz2 : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : fa0e484c85addbe89521f63963d761452937b307c4d7f00b71d5f81d2ed127dd CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : fa0e484c85addbe89521f63963d761452937b307c4d7f00b71d5f81d2ed127dd Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1093186 Buildroot used: fedora-20-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review