https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093503 --- Comment #4 from Jamie Nguyen <jamielinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #3) > (In reply to Jamie Nguyen from comment #2) > > # rpmlint lua-term > > lua-term.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm > > /usr/lib64/lua/5.2/term/core.so 0775L > > How did you end up with this permission? My local builds and the koji > builds do not have it? I've put a chmod in my spec, but this seems strange. Err, that's strange. I have no idea why/how my local mock builds would be different here. > * Fri May 2 2014 Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 0.03-2 > - Use git hash for source > - Fix .so permissions > > Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lua-term.spec > SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lua-term-0.03-2.fc20.src.rpm Rpmlint ------- Checking: lua-term-0.03-2.fc21.x86_64.rpm lua-term-0.03-2.fc21.src.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint lua-term 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpm -qp --requires ./lua-term-0.03-2.fc21.x86_64.rpm libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) lua(abi) >= 5.2 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review