[Bug 1090070] Review Request: gpaw-setups - GPAW setups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070



--- Comment #11 from Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola@xxxxxx> ---
Also, the new upstream tarballs contain LICENSE and COPYING, both of which
contain the GPLv3 license text. 

The contents of LICENSE should be similar to the one in GPAW, i.e. a brief
statement of what license the setups are distributed under.

You should include both files, in case upstream decides to put in a saner
version of LICENSE.


Per Fedora policy, inclusion of some version of the GPL without explicit
statement of the licensing means that the software is licensed under any
version of the GPL (tag GPL+).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]