https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079064 --- Comment #10 from Dennis Payne <dulsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Dridi Boukelmoune from comment #9) Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dulsi/btbuilder/master/btbuilder.spec SRPM URL: http://identicalsoftware.com/btbuilder/btbuilder-0.4.4-1.fc20.src.rpm Ok. I didn't know about the fedora-review tool. I should looked at the complete Package Review Process instead of just the joining page. > You will need to fix this, and mention all the licenses for the package: > => for instance "License: GPLv2 and GPLv3+" GPLv3+ is the only license. It was GPLv2+ but when I replaced the images some of the new images were GPLv3+. Rather than specify what is GPLv2+ and what is GPL3+, everything is now GPLv3+. > I encourage you to bump the Release tag every time you submit a new version > during the review. > > * date name <email> - version-3 > - Updated the license for both code and assets I would but I've been doing new releases of the project. I know I could do 0.4.4-3 even though there is no 0.4.4-1 or 0.4.4-2 I'd rather not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review