https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069243 --- Comment #16 from David Sugar <dyfet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- This bug also lead me to a different and interesting question, which is about software collections and rpath. It would seem to me that if you are doing the alternate software collection style rpm build with an appropriately modified rpm that you would want the rpath to be retained, to make sure that libraries used in the collection are loaded by collection's binaries in place of the default system ones when the collection does provide it's own versions. This issue is not discussed at all in the software collection faq. It is relevant to me because I am thinking of converting my packages to also build as a software collection for use with rhel... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review