https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069259 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for updating (In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #10) > > [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. > > Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/nagios/brokers > > [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/nagios/brokers > > [!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). > > Fixed. Thanks > > [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. > > please add comment above the Patch lines > > Done. Great > > ndoutils.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/ndoutils nagios > > ndoutils.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/ndoutils nagios > > This is correct, files should have those requirements as the "broker" is run > by Nagios. Ok > > ndoutils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/file2sock 0774L > > ndoutils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/sockdebug 0774L > > ndoutils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/log2ndo 0774L > > Fixed, this is a bug in the installation script, I've created a patch that > also removes the user/group ownership when installing (was a separate sed > line in the spec file). Cool I will wait a bit more then to see what fedora legal may say. You may want to send a mail to fedora legal list directly to discuss the license issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review