[Bug 1089559] Review Request: tlp - Advanced power management tool for Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089559



--- Comment #5 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Ah I found my answer:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Filesystem_Layout

The Multilib Exempt Locations section describes it pretty well, items that
would normally be put in libexec can use %{_prefix}/lib instead of %{_libdir}.
The Libexecdir section goes on to say that the libexec section is not required.

This rpmlint error can be treated as a non-issue, although rpmlint suggests
that they should really be in /usr/share. Let me know what you think and I can
direct this issue towards the developer if necessary.

I noticed the non-conffile-in-etc error in rpmlint though. I believe this is a
false positive but I'm a little confused how bash-completion files should be
handled... Let me know what you think.

Also at the developer's request, I've re-added tpacpi-bat, as even though it
requires kmod's, it's an optional require. If someone decides to add them later
to the kernel or to rpmfusion, it should adapt seamlessly according to the
developer.

None the less, I've uploaded the file at the same links. Note that I'm not
bumping the release because the old one didn't build.. I bumped the changelog
though.

SPEC URL: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/tlp.spec
SRPM URL: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/tlp-0.5-1.fc20.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]