https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085441 --- Comment #4 from Will Benton <willb@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Just a few issues here, Mike. Issues: ======= - several rpmlint errors here: - non-executable-script ones can be handled either by removing the shebang or changing mode - the dir and conf permissions are justified; thanks for commenting on these - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation - The Obsoletes should capture %dist tags in releases, so "openstack-savanna <= 2014.1.b3-3" instead of "openstack-savanna <= 2014.1.b3-2" - are you using this spec for EPEL too? if not, %defattr is unnecessary Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: %defattr present but not needed [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [!]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. - see above; "openstack-savanna <= 2014.1.b3-3" is correct [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines - except as mentioned [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. - absence justified [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: openstack-sahara-2014.1.rc1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm openstack-sahara-2014.1.rc1-1.fc21.src.rpm openstack-sahara.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/sahara sahara openstack-sahara.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/sahara sahara openstack-sahara.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/sahara 0700L openstack-sahara.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/sahara sahara openstack-sahara.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/sahara sahara openstack-sahara.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/sahara/sahara.conf sahara openstack-sahara.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/sahara/sahara.conf 0640L openstack-sahara.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sahara/cli/sahara_api.py 0644L /usr/bin/env openstack-sahara.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sahara/cli/sahara_subprocess.py 0644L /usr/bin/env openstack-sahara.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sahara/plugins/vanilla/v2_3_0/resources/post_conf.template 0644L /bin/bash openstack-sahara.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/openstack-sahara/html/_static/jquery.js openstack-sahara.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/sahara openstack-sahara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary _sahara-subprocess openstack-sahara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sahara-api openstack-sahara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sahara-db-manage 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 10 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint openstack-sahara openstack-sahara.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/sahara sahara openstack-sahara.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/sahara sahara openstack-sahara.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/sahara 0700L openstack-sahara.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/sahara sahara openstack-sahara.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/sahara sahara openstack-sahara.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/sahara/sahara.conf sahara openstack-sahara.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/sahara/sahara.conf 0640L openstack-sahara.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sahara/cli/sahara_api.py 0644L /usr/bin/env openstack-sahara.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sahara/cli/sahara_subprocess.py 0644L /usr/bin/env openstack-sahara.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sahara/plugins/vanilla/v2_3_0/resources/post_conf.template 0644L /bin/bash openstack-sahara.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/openstack-sahara/html/_static/jquery.js openstack-sahara.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/sahara openstack-sahara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary _sahara-subprocess openstack-sahara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sahara-api openstack-sahara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sahara-db-manage 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 10 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- openstack-sahara (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/bash /bin/sh /usr/bin/python2 config(openstack-sahara) python(abi) python-alembic python-cinderclient python-eventlet python-flask python-iso8601 python-jsonschema python-keystoneclient python-neutronclient python-novaclient python-oslo-config python-oslo-messaging python-paramiko python-pbr python-six python-sqlalchemy python-stevedore python-swiftclient python-webob shadow-utils systemd Provides -------- openstack-sahara: config(openstack-sahara) openstack-sahara openstack-savanna Source checksums ---------------- http://tarballs.openstack.org/sahara/sahara-2014.1.rc1.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 867ed0e937b2d5db4239d827c172910ea1120614154f240fed186488986dc182 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 867ed0e937b2d5db4239d827c172910ea1120614154f240fed186488986dc182 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1085441 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review