https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086790 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- $ rpmdiff gnudos-1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm.OLD1 gnudos-1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Binary files old/gnudos-1.0.tar.gz and new/gnudos-1.0.tar.gz differ Huh? You've recreated the tarball with modified contents and without any comment. That's a rather unpolite thing to do during package review. Take your time and present packages you've self-reviewed. The review queue is not a place where to expect reviewers to do _all_ the work. Especially if you've been sponsored just recently, it can be a good idea to do your stuff painstakingly and -- in case of doubt -- ask your sponsor for a brief look at a spec file. > +%package devel > +Summary: Header files for the GnuDOS library > +Group: System Environment/Libraries The Group tag for library -devel packages is "Development/Libraries". It can be helpful to examine _existing_ packages as a reference. > +Provides: %{name}-devel-%{version} This makes no sense. There are automatic Provides for packages and subpackages. Take your time and query the built binary packages with "rpm". > +%description devel > +This package contains header files necessary to develop programs using the > GnuDOS corelib library of functions Similar to the %summary, the contents are _not_ only headers. You've misplaced the *.so symlink. It belongs in the -devel package. > > %{_includedir}/console/* > > Fixed Not. The directory is still not included in the package: > +%files devel > +%{_includedir}/console/* And in the following line you've created a new "unowned" directory: > +%{_docdir}/gnudos/* Please return to the previous comment in bugzilla and revisit the link to the File/Dir Ownership packaging guidelines. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review