https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086790 --- Comment #2 from Mohammed Isam <mohammed_isam1984@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #1) > The packaging looks sloppy and half-hearted. :-( Not intended to be so :-).. Fixing > > > Summary: The GnuDOS library for GNU/Linux > > Group: Applications/Productivity Fixed > > Library and headers in a single package? That's not how it is done with Red > Hat and Fedora distributions: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Devel_Packages > > > > %{_includedir}/console/* > Fixed > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging: > Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories > > > > %{_infodir}/* > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo > Added missing scriplets > > $ rpmls -p gnudos-1.0-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm |grep ^d > > drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/fog > > drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/gnudos > > drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/mino > > drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/prime > > Not directly a blocker, but it's not nice of an RPM package called "gnudos" > to occupy the doc homedirs "fog", "mino" and "prime" just because it > includes executables with the same names. Typically, the package > documentation is included below %_docdir/%name (i.e. %_pkgdocdir for F20 and > newer). > Fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review